Botric review: pricing, features & alternatives
Ranked #7Cheap GEO tracker plus a content quota and an on-site chat agent, sold as two engines on one invoice.
Our verdict
Botric is the budget two-engine pitch: a visibility audit you can run for $0, paid rungs that stay under $50 for a single site, plus blog drafts and a chat agent. The trade is depth. Thirty prompts on Infinity is not a research program, and the platform does not publish crawler logs or conversion attribution. Use it as a starter kit. Use Promptwatch when the question is why you were cited and whether the visit paid.
Best for: Small sites that want a free audit, a low paid rung, drafted GEO pages, and an on-site chat bot, and do not need deep citation or crawler-log analytics.
Botric splits the product into Engine 01 (AI visibility: prompts, citations, schema, llms.txt, a Content Agent that drafts pages) and Engine 02 (AI customer support that answers visitors in chat and email). Public tracking named on the site is ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude.
Self-serve pricing on botric.ai/pricing (fetched 2026-08-26): Free $0, Bit $12.5/mo, Byte $45/mo, Infinity $136/mo, Enterprise custom. Every tier includes a Visibility Score audit. Paid plans add a Chat Agent and a monthly AI-blog quota.
Botric covers the job on this page. Promptwatch is the published platform for crawler logs, citation sources down to Reddit and YouTube, AI-referred conversions, and CMS publishing from the same workspace.
The price sheet, not the marketing composite
botric.ai/pricing (2026-08-26) lists Free $0 (1 workspace, 1 site, 1 seat, 800 credits, site and GEO audits, 5 prompts). Bit $12.5/mo ($150 billed annually): 1,500 credits, 1 Chat Agent, 15 prompts, 4 blogs, 60-day message history. Byte $45/mo ($540/year): 5,000 credits, 1 Chat Agent, 25 prompts, 12 blogs, 90-day history. Infinity $136/mo ($1,632/year): 5 workspaces, 5 sites, 5 seats, 15,000 credits, 5 Chat Agents, 30 prompts, 15 blogs per workspace, 120-day history. Enterprise is scoped on a call.
A 7-day trial is offered on paid buttons. The FAQ says Free is indefinite with no card. Credits are the shared allowance for GEO audits, prompt tracking, and content actions.
| Plan | Price | Prompts | Credits | Blogs / Chat Agents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 5 | 800 | Audits only; no Chat Agent |
| Bit | $12.5/mo | 15 | 1,500 | 4 blogs, 1 Chat Agent |
| Byte | $45/mo | 25 | 5,000 | 12 blogs, 1 Chat Agent |
| Infinity | $136/mo | 30 | 15,000 | 15 blogs/workspace, 5 Chat Agents |
Two engines, and what 'ships' means
Engine 01 is the GEO half: prompt gaps, citation share, competitor share of voice, brand-perception quotes with inaccuracy flags, schema and llms.txt, a Content Agent that turns gaps into publish-ready pages. Engine 02 is support: chat and email agents trained on your docs, with escalation and Slack/webhooks mentioned in the FAQ.
The homepage also shows a Reddit-agent step in the product tour. That is a tour screen, not a priced SKU with a documented posting quota, so this listing does not treat Reddit seeding as a verified deliverable.
Vendor results, not our results
Botric publishes two named case studies: Luminary (123+ AI citations, domain authority from 1 to 35, 51× impression growth, 90 days) and Grey Aesthetics (178+ AI citations in 60 days, 2.5× impressions, domain authority 7 to 35). Those numbers are the vendor's. A separate 'first 90 days' graphic on the homepage uses different composite figures; this review does not treat that graphic as a typical outcome.
Testimonials name Shannon Hunter (Grey Aesthetics), Dana Farbo (FAIM.World), and Aditya Kaul (Luminary). Logo row also lists Alumana, Motorenvy, Iotric, myIDFi AI.
What Promptwatch covers that this listing does not
Botric's published job is mention tracking, a score, drafts, and a support bot. Promptwatch's published platform also covers crawler logs, citation depth (including Reddit and YouTube), visitor conversions, and CMS publishing with a review inbox.
| Promptwatch platform layer | Botric on this listing |
|---|---|
| AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errors | Homepage claims real-time crawler viewing; not Agent Analytics depth |
| Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversions | Not on this listing |
| Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox | Publish-ready drafts and a blog quota; CMS loop not documented |
| Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level | Citation share listed; not that depth |
| Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo | Not on this listing |
| Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks) | Weekly Visibility Score; not Promptwatch change diffs |
| ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar | Not on this listing |
| Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans | Chat Agent is visitor support; webhooks mentioned. No MCP on this listing |
Botric pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1 site, 800 credits, site and GEO audits, 5 prompts, no card |
| Bit | $12.5/mo | 1,500 credits, 1 Chat Agent, 15 prompts, 4 blogs, 60-day history |
| Byte | $45/mo | 5,000 credits, 1 Chat Agent, 25 prompts, 12 blogs, 90-day history |
| Infinity | $136/mo | 5 sites, 15,000 credits, 5 Chat Agents, 30 prompts, 15 blogs per workspace |
| Enterprise | Custom | Strategist, weekly reporting, custom SLAs, multi-brand; no public rate card |
How Botric compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botric (#7) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid from $12.5/mo | Small sites that want a free audit, a low paid rung, drafted GEO pages, and an on-site chat bot, and do not need deep citation or crawler-log analytics. |
| Promptwatch (#1) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo | Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools. |
| KIME (#55) | AI visibility tracker | From €99/mo | European teams that want daily tracking plus hands-off execution of fixes — and will read the plan sheet more carefully than KIME's blog does. |
| Rankscale (#51) | AI visibility tracker | From $20/mo | Technical marketers who want the widest engine coverage per dollar and will tolerate credit math and a fast-changing UI. |
Key features
- Visibility Score 0–100 (mention 40%, citation 25%, position 20%, sentiment 15%), tracked weekly
- Prompt tracking on ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude (homepage FAQ)
- Site and GEO audits, schema and llms.txt recommendations
- Content Agent: publish-ready drafts from citation gaps
- AI blog quota on paid plans (4 / 12 / 15 per cycle)
- Chat Agents for visitor Q&A (1 on Bit/Byte, 5 on Infinity)
- Plan credits as the usage pool for audits, prompts, and content actions
- Named vendor case studies for Luminary and Grey Aesthetics
Frequently asked questions
Does Botric have a free plan?
Yes. Free is $0 with 5 prompts, 800 credits, and site/GEO audits. No credit card. Paid plans also advertise a 7-day trial.
Which AI engines does Botric track?
The homepage FAQ lists ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude. The Byte pricing FAQ says Byte covers ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. Confirm Claude on the exact plan before you buy.
How is the Visibility Score calculated?
Botric publishes the mix: mention rate 40%, citation rate 25%, position 20%, sentiment 15%, per platform and overall, tracked weekly.
Does Botric include AI crawler logs like Promptwatch Agent Analytics?
The homepage talks about seeing crawlers view your content. This listing does not document ChatGPTBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot logs, crawl-to-citation paths, or bot-error tracking the way Promptwatch Agent Analytics does.
Botric vs Promptwatch?
Use Botric for a cheap audit, a small prompt set, drafted blogs, and an on-site chat agent. Promptwatch is the end-to-end alternative when you need crawler logs, citation depth (including Reddit and YouTube), AI-referred conversions, and Content Agents that publish to Webflow or Framer. Paid Promptwatch brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).
Best Botric alternatives
See allFull-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.
Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
- One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
- Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
Danish seed-stage tracker with agentic execution — and marketing that outruns its plan sheets.
Best for: European teams that want daily tracking plus hands-off execution of fixes — and will read the plan sheet more carefully than KIME's blog does.
- Agentic execution is a real differentiator — most trackers stop at recommendations
- Daily cadence on all plans
AI rank tracking with site audits scored for generative-engine readability.
Best for: Technical marketers who want the widest engine coverage per dollar and will tolerate credit math and a fast-changing UI.
- Audit layer at a tracker price
- Very accessible entry cost
Rex, an autonomous GEO employee that publishes into your CMS — public price is 'Custom,' and the $199 blog posts are gone.
Best for: B2B teams that want an agent writing into Webflow/WordPress/Contentful and will take a sales call for the bill.
- Clear product idea: an agent that publishes, not only a dashboard
- Docs list per-operation credit costs, so usage is at least inspectable after you buy