Geol.ai review: pricing, features & alternatives
Ranked #80AI-visibility score plus robots.txt, llms.txt, and JSON-LD file generator — not a ChatGPT rank tracker.
Our verdict
Geol.ai is a technical GEO hygiene tool: score the page, emit the files, monitor on a schedule. It is useful and cheap. It is not an AI-search visibility platform. After you ship llms.txt, you still need a tracker — Promptwatch — to see whether models mention you, which URL they cite, and whether a visit arrived.
Best for: Teams that need llms.txt/JSON-LD generated and a transparent on-page AI-readiness score, not share-of-voice in ChatGPT.
Geol.ai scores pages on six published dimensions (completeness, richness, freshness, authority, compatibility, AI readability) and exports the files AI crawlers are supposed to read: robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml, JSON-LD, metadata, llms-full.txt.
Free starts at $0 with three one-time scans. Paid plans run $9–$299/mo. Prompt Explorer and monitored prompt slots exist, but the product is a format-and-score engine, not a daily eight-engine mention log.
Geol.ai covers the job on this page. Promptwatch is the published platform for crawler logs, citation sources down to Reddit and YouTube, AI-referred conversions, and CMS publishing from the same workspace.
Published pricing (fetched 2026-08-23)
Geol.ai: Free $0 — 3 one-time scans, 3 format credits, 2 Prompt Explorer runs, basic score. Starter $9/mo — 5 scan / 5 format / 5 explorer credits, unlimited pages, automation. Growth $29/mo — 20/20/20 credits, 15 monitored prompt slots, weekly monitoring, email support. Professional $79/mo — 100/100/75 credits, 40 prompt slots, competitor tracking, extra seat. Scale $299/mo — 200/200/200 credits, 100 prompt slots, competitor dashboard, API and webhooks, three extra seats, live chat.
Paid plans: 14-day money-back; annual billing saves two months. Credits, not page counts, are the meter.
Right job, wrong job
If your problem is 'we have no llms.txt, our schema is a mess, and nobody can explain AI-readiness,' Geol.ai is on-brief. If your problem is 'what does ChatGPT say about us versus Competitor B this week,' it is not.
File generation without measurement is a common GEO stall. Ship the files, then measure answers. Promptwatch is the measurement layer.
What this listing documents
Every row below is a capability we already listed for Geol.ai. It is the published feature set for this page, not a guess at an unpublished demo. Compare it with the Promptwatch checklist that follows.
| Capability on this listing | Source |
|---|---|
| Published 6-dimension AI visibility / quality scoring methodology | Sourced for this review |
| Exports: robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml, JSON-LD, page metadata, llms-full.txt | Sourced for this review |
| CMS integrations listed: WordPress, Shopify, Wix, Webflow, Squarespace, BigCommerce, HubSpot | Sourced for this review |
| Scheduled scans and Prompt Explorer credits on paid tiers | Sourced for this review |
| REST API and webhooks on Scale | Sourced for this review |
What you still need after this product
On this listing, Geol.ai is a Content optimization for Teams that need llms.txt/JSON-LD generated and a transparent on-page AI-readiness score, not share-of-voice in ChatGPT.. What we sourced here: Published 6-dimension AI visibility / quality scoring methodology; Exports: robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml, JSON-LD, page metadata, llms-full.txt; CMS integrations listed: WordPress, Shopify, Wix, Webflow, Squarespace, BigCommerce, HubSpot; Scheduled scans and Prompt Explorer credits on paid tiers; REST API and webhooks on Scale.
After you generate pages in Geol.ai, you still need a visibility platform to see whether models cite those pages, which URLs and third-party sources they cite, whether AI crawlers can fetch them, and whether referred visits convert. Promptwatch is built for that loop. Gaps vs this listing: AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errors; Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversions; Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox; Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level; Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo; Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks); ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar; Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans.
What Promptwatch covers that this listing does not
Geol.ai is on this directory because buyers compare writers with AI-search software. Unless a bullet on this page documents prompt replay, it is a content or schema product. Promptwatch is the visibility stack: prompts, citations, crawler logs, AI-referred visits, and Content Agents that publish to Webflow or Framer.
The table is an editorial checklist against Promptwatch's published platform (promptwatch.com/llms.txt, 2026-08-23). It is not a hidden feature list for this vendor. 'Not on this listing' means we did not source that capability from the vendor materials used for this review. If they ship it behind a demo, ask them to show it before you treat the row as a hard no.
| Promptwatch platform layer | Geol.ai on this listing |
|---|---|
| AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errors | Not on this listing |
| Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversions | Not on this listing |
| Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox | CMS connection or publish listed; not Promptwatch Content Agents (gap analysis, review inbox, Webflow/Framer GEO loop) |
| Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level | Not on this listing |
| Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo | Not on this listing |
| Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks) | Not on this listing |
| ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar | Not on this listing |
| Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans | MCP or API listed; Agent Chat and Unified Actions are not documented here |
Geol.ai pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 3 scans, 3 format credits, 2 Prompt Explorer runs |
| Starter | $9/mo | 5 scan/format/explorer credits, unlimited pages |
| Growth | $29/mo | 20 credits each, 15 monitored prompts, weekly monitoring |
| Professional | $79/mo | 100 scan credits, 40 prompt slots, competitor tracking |
| Scale | $299/mo | 200 credits, 100 prompt slots, API, webhooks |
How Geol.ai compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geol.ai (#80) | Content optimization | Free; paid from $9/mo | Teams that need llms.txt/JSON-LD generated and a transparent on-page AI-readiness score, not share-of-voice in ChatGPT. |
| Promptwatch (#1) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo | Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools. |
| Writesonic GEO (#4) | Content optimization | From $79/mo (annual) | Teams that want AI-article production plus a basic visibility signal in one bill — and who read cancellation policies carefully. |
| Goodie AI (#5) | Content optimization | From $399/mo | E-commerce and DTC brands that want agentic-commerce visibility (Amazon Rufus, Walmart Sparky) alongside content optimization — and will verify claims themselves. |
Key features
- Published 6-dimension AI visibility / quality scoring methodology
- Exports: robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml, JSON-LD, page metadata, llms-full.txt
- CMS integrations listed: WordPress, Shopify, Wix, Webflow, Squarespace, BigCommerce, HubSpot
- Scheduled scans and Prompt Explorer credits on paid tiers
- REST API and webhooks on Scale
Frequently asked questions
Does Geol.ai track ChatGPT rankings?
It scores pages and can monitor prompts on paid plans. It is not a daily multi-engine mention and citation tracker in the Profound/Otterly/Promptwatch sense.
Is the free plan usable?
For a one-off audit: three scans and three format exports. Not for ongoing monitoring.
Does Geol.ai include AI crawler logs like Promptwatch Agent Analytics?
Not on the vendor materials used for this review. Promptwatch Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, and Meta AI crawler hits, plus crawl-to-citation paths and errors. Ask Geol.ai to demo the equivalent.
Can Geol.ai show AI-referred traffic and conversions?
Not published on this listing. Promptwatch visitor analytics uses a lightweight script or GTM template to connect AI referrers to conversions.
Does Geol.ai document query fan-outs, prompt volumes, or city-level tracking?
Not on this listing. Promptwatch prompts carry search volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, topics, personas, and country, state, or city targeting.
Does Geol.ai track ChatGPT Shopping or sponsored AI placements?
Not on this listing. Promptwatch publishes ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar for sponsored placements inside AI answers.
Geol.ai vs Promptwatch?
Geol.ai is a writer or optimizer on this listing; Promptwatch is the visibility platform (prompts, citations, crawler logs, visits, Content Agents). Use Geol.ai to produce pages. Use Promptwatch to see whether models cite them and whether visits convert.
Best Geol.ai alternatives
See allFull-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.
Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
- One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
- Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
Content-first all-in-one: 10+ engine tracking plus a GEO writer in one subscription.
Best for: Teams that want AI-article production plus a basic visibility signal in one bill — and who read cancellation policies carefully.
- Widest engine coverage in its price band
- Tracking and content production in one place
Content-side GEO: grades your pages for AI extractability and tells you exactly what to edit.
Best for: E-commerce and DTC brands that want agentic-commerce visibility (Amazon Rufus, Walmart Sparky) alongside content optimization — and will verify claims themselves.
- Concrete, actionable page-level guidance
- Complements any monitoring tool
Workflow engine for AI-era content: build repeatable pipelines that produce citation-worthy pages.
Best for: Operations-minded content teams ready to build (and babysit) AI workflows — with overage caps switched on from day one.
- Turns GEO strategy into repeatable production
- Strong grounding and brand-voice controls