Adaptify vs Goodie AI (2026): Publish New Pages or Fix the Ones You Have?
Adaptify writes and publishes new GEO articles from $499 per site. Goodie AI grades existing pages and recommends edits from $399/mo. Which approach acts, and what to pair it with.
You can get a brand into AI answers in two ways. Publish something new that answers the prompt, or rework the pages you already have so a model can lift a clean answer out of them. Adaptify bets on the first approach. Goodie AI bets on the second. The right choice depends on whether your site is thin or just badly structured.
Either method still needs a way to check that the change worked. That check is what we weigh most on this site, and it's why Promptwatch is the yardstick in the table.
How they compare
| Adaptify | Goodie AI | Promptwatch | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Write and publish new articles for missed prompts | Grade existing pages and recommend specific edits | Gap analysis feeding Content Agents, plus page-level citation data |
| Entry price | $499/mo per site, billed monthly | Explorer $399/mo | Free Explore; Essential $95/mo |
| Engines at entry | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot | ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity; Gemini, Copilot and Amazon Rufus on quote-only Pro; Claude on Enterprise | All tracked LLMs, from Essential up |
| Prompts at entry | Not published | 100 prompts, 3,000 responses | 50 prompts, 6,000 responses |
| Unit of action | Articles, unlimited under fair use | 10 optimization actions on Explorer | 5 AEO articles on Essential |
| Publishing | WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Shopify, HubSpot CMS, Duda | Not listed; your team applies the edits | Webflow and Framer, review inbox first |
| Commerce | Not listed | Amazon Rufus and Walmart Sparky in its pitch | ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar |
| Checking the result | Re-test on the next 14-day cycle | Citation lift tracking; GA-based revenue attribution | Prompt and citation trends, crawler logs, conversions |
| AI crawler logs | Not published | Not published | Agent Analytics from Professional |
What Adaptify does with a missed prompt
Adaptify treats every gap as a missing article. It builds a prompt set from the site, keywords, location and competitors (or your CSV), runs all five engines in one pass every 14 days, and scores each prompt from 0 to 100 on position, coverage, competition and content opportunity. High scorers go into a seven-stage writing pipeline, the article is published to the client's CMS, and the next cycle tests whether the brand now shows up. Monthly PR backlinks and technical SEO fixes come in the same $499.
That works for a site that simply hasn't covered a topic. It does less for a site that has the content and still isn't cited, where the fix is usually structure rather than another post. No prompt allowance is published, and fourteen days is a long wait to learn whether an article landed.
What Goodie does with a weak page
Goodie reads your pages roughly the way a language model would, grades them for how easily an answer can be extracted, and hands back specific edits: answer-block length, schema additions, entity disambiguation. After the change it tracks whether the page starts earning citations, and GA-based revenue attribution tries to put a number on it, which makes Goodie the closer of the two to a real verify step. It also tracks visibility inside Amazon Rufus and Walmart Sparky, which almost nobody else does, and holds SOC 2 Type II, with Unilever, Dermalogica and SteelSeries among its clients.
The caveats are about coverage and proof. Explorer at $399 covers three engines; Claude needs Enterprise, and Pro, where Rufus starts, is quote-only. Independent reviews are scarce, and much of the detailed coverage online comes from NoGood, the agency run by Goodie's founder, Mostafa ElBermawy. Goodie also doesn't list crawler logs, Reddit or YouTube source tracking, or prompt volume data.
Picking between them
If your site is missing whole topics, Adaptify is the better tool, because it writes and ships the pages instead of advising on them. Agencies will also like its flat per-site price.
If your site already has the content and engines skip it, Goodie is the better tool, especially for a DTC or e-commerce brand that cares about Amazon Rufus. Run a pilot before a long contract, given the thin independent track record.
Both stop short of telling you why an engine ignored a page. A page that errors when ClaudeBot requests it won't be cited however well it's written, and neither vendor documents AI crawler logs.
Where Promptwatch fits
Promptwatch supports both methods from one dataset. Citation analytics show which of your existing pages get cited, at page and domain level, along with Reddit, YouTube and offsite mentions, so you can tell which pages need Goodie-style fixing and which topics need a new page. Content gap analysis feeds Content Agents, which write new articles and publish them to Webflow or Framer after review in an inbox. Agent Analytics logs AI crawler visits with error tracking and a crawl-to-citation path, which answers the "was it even read" question before you rewrite anything. Visitor analytics connects AI-referred visits to conversions with a script or GTM template.
For commerce, Promptwatch tracks ChatGPT Shopping and runs Ads Radar for sponsored placements. It doesn't list Amazon Rufus or Walmart Sparky, so an Amazon-heavy brand has a real reason to look at Goodie. Essential at $95 a month covers daily tracking and 5 AEO articles. Crawler logs start on Professional at $245, which also raises the limits to 150 prompts and 15 articles.
Verdict
New pages: Adaptify. Better pages and Rufus visibility: Goodie. Most sites need some of each, plus a view of crawls, citations and conversions underneath. That's the case for evaluating Promptwatch first. It tells you which method a given prompt needs, can publish the new page itself, and shows whether the result turned into revenue.
FAQ
Is Goodie AI cheaper than Adaptify?
At entry, yes: $399 a month against $499 per site. But Explorer covers three engines and 10 optimization actions, while Adaptify's plan includes five engines, articles and backlinks.
Does Goodie AI publish content?
Its listing describes grading pages and recommending edits, not publishing. Adaptify publishes directly to six CMSs.
Should I pick Promptwatch instead of Adaptify or Goodie AI?
If your main need is knowing what to fix and proving it worked, yes. Promptwatch adds daily multi-engine tracking, page-level citation analytics, AI crawler logs and conversion tracking. Adaptify still leads on backlinks and CMS breadth, and Goodie on Amazon Rufus coverage.