Seology Review 2026
Seology runs 200+ checks and ships deterministic fixes as GitHub pull requests. Promptwatch measures whether those fixes get cited and publishes GEO articles.
A tool earns its rank here when it acts after the audit. Seology does. It runs 200+ checks across technical SEO, on-page, structured data, Core Web Vitals, indexation, and GEO visibility, then sorts each issue into two buckets. Auto-fixable issues ship as GitHub pull requests. Judgment-call issues get flagged with a recommendation instead. That split is the part most "AI SEO" tools skip, and Seology names it out loud.
We fetched the Seology homepage and pricing page on 5 September 2026. The numbers below come from that fetch and the catalog entry. Where the vendor does not publish a number, we say so rather than guess.
The two-bucket model
The auto-fixable bucket is where the agent writes code: meta titles and descriptions, canonicals, alt text, schema markup, redirect chains, robots directives, Open Graph and Twitter Card, and hreflang. These are deterministic fixes. The same input should produce the same diff, which is exactly what you want in a pull request you can review. A reviewer can skim the diff and trust the change, because there is no editorial judgment hiding in it.
The flagged bucket is where the agent stops and asks a human: content gaps, internal linking, ambiguous redirects, E-E-A-T, and topic clusters. These need editorial judgment. A tool that auto-applies them is a liability. Seology flags them with a recommendation and waits, which is the honest design. The split also tells you where to spend your time: merge the deterministic fixes, then sit down with the flagged list.
Three modes control how far the agent goes. Monitor audits and alerts only. Co-pilot proposes and waits. Autopilot opens pull requests and reports. Autopilot is the mode that earns the agentic label here, but it needs a real review habit to stay safe. A standard git revert undoes any merged change because every fix lives in your repository.
GEO checks in the same audit
GEO visibility checks for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini run in the same audit, not as a paid add-on. That is the part that matters in 2026. A tool that charges separately for "the AI part" is selling you two products. Seology folds it in. The checks score whether your pages are readable by those engines, which is a fix-side concern. They do not measure whether the engines then cite you, which is the measurement half Seology leaves to a platform like Promptwatch.
Platforms list Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, Wix, Squarespace, and custom sites via Magic.js. The custom-site path matters because so many enterprise sites are neither Shopify nor WordPress.
Pricing
Starter is free for 1 site with weekly scans, 50 auto-fixes per month, an SEO score dashboard, and community support. That is a real working tier for a single site, not a demo. The 50 auto-fixes cap is the limit you will hit first.
Pro is $49 per month for 5 sites, daily scans, unlimited fixes, GEO optimization, API access, and priority support. A free trial runs before billing. Pro is the rung where Autopilot and daily cadence make sense for an agency.
Enterprise is custom priced with unlimited sites, real-time monitoring, white-label reports, a dedicated account manager, custom integrations, and SLA guarantees. Enterprise is contact-led, not self-serve.
What Seology does not publish
The catalog entry is direct about the gaps. No published AI crawler log tracking. No citation analytics at page, Reddit, or YouTube level. No visitor conversions tied to AI-referred traffic. No CMS publishing path for GEO articles to Webflow or Framer.
Seology fixes your code so AI engines can read your site. It does not then measure whether they cite you, show the crawl-to-citation path, or publish the GEO article that fills a gap the audit found. Those are different jobs.
Where Promptwatch fits
Promptwatch is the measurement and publishing layer Seology does not cover. Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, and the Meta AI crawler, and maps each crawl to a citation. That closes the loop: Seology ships a schema fix as a pull request, you merge, and Promptwatch shows whether ChatGPTBot came back and whether the page started getting cited.
Content Agents plan, write, and publish GEO articles to Webflow or Framer with a review inbox, sourced from your content gaps and prompts. Essential is $95 per month with a 7-day trial, 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 200K visitor events, and five AEO articles. Professional is $245 per month with 150 prompts, 18,000 responses, 1M visitor events, 25 million crawler logs, and 15 AEO articles. Explore is free with 10 ChatGPT prompts, one project, and one seat.
The pairing is clean. Seology is the fix layer. Promptwatch is the measurement and publish layer. They answer different questions and they do not overlap.
Verdict
Buy Seology Pro ($49/mo) if your team will review pull requests and you want deterministic fixes shipped as code across up to 5 sites. Use Starter free for a single site under 50 fixes a month. Buy Promptwatch Essential or Professional if you also need crawl-to-citation proof and CMS publishing. promptwatch.com. Directory: /tools/seology/, /tools/promptwatch/.
FAQ
Is the free plan agentic?
Partly. Starter audits and auto-fixes up to 50 fixes a month. Autopilot mode, which opens pull requests without prompting, is on Pro and above.
Can Seology replace Promptwatch?
No. Seology fixes code. It does not publish crawler logs, citation analytics, or visitor conversions. Add Promptwatch for the visibility half.
Does Seology publish GEO articles to a CMS?
Not on this listing. Seology ships fixes as pull requests. Promptwatch Content Agents publish GEO articles to Webflow or Framer with a review inbox.