Citeme review: pricing, features & alternatives
Ranked #78Paris GEO agency plus a 59 € self-serve tracker. Public euros, messy plan math, and a competitor review of Promptwatch we do not adopt.
Our verdict
Citeme is a Paris GEO retainer with a cheap login attached. 690 € and 1,190 € buy people. 59 € buys the dashboard if you run it yourself. That is not Promptwatch Essential at $95/mo with 6,000 responses, visitor events, and citation analytics, and it is not Professional at $245/mo with 25M crawler logs. Use Citeme if you want a French team on a dated content quota. Use Promptwatch if you need the ranked measurement stack. Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).
Best for: French or EU teams that want humans writing GEO pages and Reddit work on a euro retainer, and will treat the 59 € login as a sidecar, not as Promptwatch.
Citeme (citeme.io) is an outsourced GEO/SEO team with its own dashboard. Schema.org lists Citeme under parent Mekaa, 229 rue Saint-Honoré, 75001 Paris, contact@citeme.fr. Engines named on the homepage: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok. Footer: made in France, GDPR. Do not mix this listing with citeme.eu, a different usage-priced product.
Live /pricing (fetched 2026-08-28, excl. VAT): platform alone 59 €/mo or 590 €/yr; team Essential 690 €, Most Popular 1,190 €, All inclusive 2,590 €, with 5/10/15 % off at 3/6/12 months. Homepage still says 'two done-for-you plans.' pricing.md names 9-month 15 % off and omits All inclusive. Older Citeme vs-Peec posts (May 2026) still say $49/mo. Screenshot checkout.
Citeme covers the job on this page. Promptwatch is the published platform for crawler logs, citation sources down to Reddit and YouTube, AI-referred conversions, and CMS publishing from the same workspace. Citeme's own Promptwatch review (27 August 2026, 4.0/5) is a competitor piece; we rank Promptwatch from promptwatch.com/llms.txt, not from that score.
Which euro sticker to screenshot
citeme.io/pricing (2026-08-28). Platform: 59 €/mo, 590 €/yr (−17 %), 7-day trial, no card, Stripe. Team table: Essential 690 € (1–2 content pieces), Most Popular 1,190 € (4–6), All inclusive 2,590 € (8–12). Discounts on that table: 3 mo −5 %, 6 mo −10 %, 12 mo −15 % (655 / 1,130 / 2,460 at three months). pricing.md instead lists 9-month −15 % (586 / 1,011) and no All inclusive row. llms.txt matches 690 / 1,190 / 59. Enterprise custom. Agency white-label on request.
Most Popular homepage card: 1,130 € with 1,190 € struck at the 3-month −5 % toggle, 4–6 GEO pieces, 8–14 on-page, Reddit active, PR ongoing, weekly call, full platform. Footnote: first signals 2–6 weeks, results 3–6 months; Semrush 4.4× AI visitor value cited; not a guarantee.
| Plan | Monthly excl. VAT | Content / mo | Source to screenshot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform | 59 € (590 €/yr) | You write it | /pricing self-serve |
| Essential | 690 € | 1–2 | /pricing team table |
| Most Popular | 1,190 € (1,130 € at 3 mo) | 4–6 | Homepage + /pricing |
| All inclusive | 2,590 € | 8–12 | /pricing only; missing from pricing.md |
Agency, Beacon, and a rival review
The product is labor plus a board. Schema parent company: Mekaa. Named quote: Arthur Humeau, CEO @ BrandAppart (Gemini cites us). Trustpilot illustration on the homepage is chrome, not a score we counted. Blog 27 August 2026: Citeme rates Promptwatch 4.0/5, CrowdReply 2.8/5, Omnia 3.4/5 as 'a direct competitor.' That is vendor scoring.
Beacon (features/analytics): drop a script, classify training crawl / AI search / user fetch / referral / unknown, 18+ bots listed. Analytics copy names ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini for citations; homepage tracking still lists five engines including Grok. We do not equate this with Promptwatch Agent Analytics CDN logs and crawl-to-citation paths until a workspace shows that depth.
What Promptwatch covers that this listing does not prove
Citeme's 59 € SKU is a GEO dashboard with a bot script. Team SKUs are content quotas. Promptwatch is still the dated software stack we rank for measurement and CMS publish.
| Promptwatch platform layer | Citeme on this listing |
|---|---|
| Agent Analytics crawler logs, crawl-to-citation, bot errors | Beacon bot visits and five visit types; CDN crawl-to-citation not documented |
| Visitor analytics with conversions | Pipeline dashboard and 'AI leads/wk' projection; conversion product not a published SKU sheet |
| Content Agents to Webflow/Framer with review inbox | Humans write 1–12 pieces on team plans; 59 € is self-serve |
| Citation analytics Reddit/YouTube/offsite | Citations tracked; that grain not documented |
| Explore free 10 ChatGPT prompts | 7-day trial then read-only |
| Essential $95 / 6,000 responses / 5 AEO articles | 59 € platform with unpublished prompt caps |
Citeme pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | 59 €/mo (590 €/yr) | Self-serve GEO dashboard; 7-day trial; prompt caps not published |
| Essential (team) | 690 €/mo excl. VAT | 1–2 GEO pieces, technical GEO, 8–14 on-page, light Reddit, advisor, weekly call, platform |
| Most Popular (team) | 1,190 €/mo excl. VAT | 4–6 pieces, active Reddit, ongoing PR; 1,130 € at 3-month −5 % |
| All inclusive (team) | 2,590 €/mo excl. VAT | 8–12 pieces; on the live table, not on pricing.md |
How Citeme compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citeme (#78) | GEO service | Platform from 59 €/mo; team from 690 €/mo excl. VAT | French or EU teams that want humans writing GEO pages and Reddit work on a euro retainer, and will treat the 59 € login as a sidecar, not as Promptwatch. |
| Promptwatch (#1) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo | Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools. |
| Previsible (#77) | GEO service | Custom; no public rate card | Enterprise or mid-market teams that want embedded SEO/GEO humans on a 12-month retainer, and already have (or will buy) a measurement platform separately. |
| GetCito (#75) | GEO service | Free self-host; managed from $599/mo | Teams that will either run the open-source tracker themselves or pay agency rates for humans to do GEO. |
Key features
- Five engines on the homepage: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok
- GEO Score 0-100: visibility 40 %, authority 30 %, sentiment 30 % (homepage FAQ)
- Beacon / AI Search Analytics: script for bot visits; 18+ bots named including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, Bytespider; five visit types
- Competitive monitoring and multi-engine audit
- Team plans: GEO content, llms.txt/schema, on-page edits, Reddit/communities, digital PR, weekly call, Slack
- Integrations named: WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, GitHub (homepage); llms.txt also names LinkedIn and Search Console
- Actions / five AI SEO agents (feature pages)
- 7-day platform trial, no card; trial then read-only
- Bilingual site (English root, French /fr)
Frequently asked questions
Is Citeme a Promptwatch alternative?
The 59 € platform is a cheaper GEO login with unpublished prompt caps. Team plans are a French retainer. Promptwatch is the measurement and publishing platform: crawler logs, citation depth, conversions, Content Agents to Webflow or Framer. Paid brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).
Should I trust Citeme's 4.0/5 Promptwatch review?
It is a competitor review dated 27 August 2026. They disclose the conflict. We still use promptwatch.com/llms.txt for Promptwatch prices and quotas, including Essential $95/mo and 5 AEO articles, not Citeme's thinner Essential reading.
Citeme.io or citeme.eu?
This listing is citeme.io only. citeme.eu publishes a different slider-priced tracker. Do not blend the two invoices.
Best Citeme alternatives
See allFull-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.
Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
- One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
- Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
San Francisco SEO and GEO agency with embedded sprint teams. Not a self-serve visibility platform, and no public rate card.
Best for: Enterprise or mid-market teams that want embedded SEO/GEO humans on a 12-month retainer, and already have (or will buy) a measurement platform separately.
- Clear about being labor: three engagement models, no pretend SaaS checkout
- Named enterprise case studies (Atlassian, Sage, Kindo) sit on the live site
MIT-licensed tracker you can self-host for free — or $599/mo for a human GEO team that writes the pages.
Best for: Teams that will either run the open-source tracker themselves or pay agency rates for humans to do GEO.
- Actual free software, not a 7-day trial — MIT self-host
- Paid plans publish hours and content counts, not just 'custom'
Link-building and SEO agency that also sells GEO retainers. Not a self-serve visibility platform.
Best for: Teams that want to buy backlinks and GEO execution from an agency, not a login to a prompt tracker.
- Clear about being an agency: humans, outreach, and PR, not a SaaS SKU
- GEO measurement list is written down (mentions, citations, schema, entities, ChatGPT referrals)