GetIntel review: pricing, features & alternatives
Ranked #31Founder-priced visibility tracker that drafts the fix and ships it through your coding agent.
Our verdict
GetIntel is the cheap, fix-shipping play for founders who already run Claude Code or Cursor. $29 to $99 a month buys daily scans, a Findability Score and a drafted fix that lands in your real site as a diff you approve. The depth stops at the score and the fix. The crawler logs, AI-referred conversions and CMS publishing that Promptwatch publishes are not on this listing, and Claude is gated to the $99 tier. Use it if your workflow includes a coding agent. Pair it with Promptwatch for the measurement stack below the score.
Best for: SaaS founders and small teams who want the fix shipped into their real site, not a dashboard they have to act on separately.
GetIntel (getintel.ai) tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews name and cite your brand, scores a Findability Score from 0 to 100 across five pillars, and refreshes it daily. The differentiator is the fix: it drafts the exact change and hands it to the coding agent you already run (Claude Code or Cursor) as a reviewable diff.
Pricing is founder-friendly and published: Starter $29/mo (1 brand, 4 engines, 30 prompts, 5 competitors), Pro $49/mo (2 brands, 60 prompts, 10 competitors, CMS auto-push, white-label), Growth $99/mo (5 engines including Claude, 120 prompts, 20 competitors). A 7-day free trial needs no card.
GetIntel covers the job on this page. Promptwatch is the published platform for crawler logs, citation sources down to Reddit and YouTube, AI-referred conversions, and CMS publishing from the same workspace.
What $29 to $99 buys
getintel.ai/pricing (reviewed 2026-09-02). Starter is $29/mo for one brand across 4 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Overviews), 30 buyer prompts and 5 competitors, with daily scans, Reddit and X citation signals, GSC, API and MCP access. Pro is $49/mo for 2 brands, 60 prompts, 10 competitors, unlimited seats, CMS auto-push to WordPress, Ghost or Webflow, Ahrefs, Slack, Zapier, webhooks, white-label and scheduled reports. Growth is $99/mo for 5 engines including Claude, 120 prompts and 20 competitors.
The page is unusually honest about what each tier adds: Pro is volume over Starter, not a feature unlock, and Growth is volume over Pro. The 7-day free trial needs no card, and after it the account goes read-only with history preserved.
The coding-agent shipping model
The differentiator is the fix. Other tools show a gap in their dashboard and stop. GetIntel drafts the exact change (llms.txt, schema, Wikidata, a counter-article, an outreach email) and hands it to Claude Code or Cursor as a reviewable diff that lands in your real site. Where you have connected a CMS (WordPress, Ghost or Webflow) it auto-pushes; where you have verified outreach email it ships the draft. You approve every move, and nothing ships on autopilot.
The model assumes you run Claude Code or Cursor. Teams without that workflow cannot use the fix and are left with a dashboard. The measurement depth below the Findability Score is not on the listing: no crawler logs, no visitor analytics, no Content Agents to a CMS at the depth Promptwatch publishes.
GetIntel pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Trial | 7 days free | No card; read-only after |
| Starter | $29/mo | 1 brand, 4 engines, 30 prompts, 5 competitors, daily scans |
| Pro | $49/mo | 2 brands, 4 engines, 60 prompts, 10 competitors, CMS auto-push, white-label |
| Growth | $99/mo | 2 brands, 5 engines (incl Claude), 120 prompts, 20 competitors |
How GetIntel compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| GetIntel (#31) | AI visibility platform | From $29/mo | SaaS founders and small teams who want the fix shipped into their real site, not a dashboard they have to act on separately. |
| Promptwatch (#1) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo | Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools. |
| Relixir (#17) | AI visibility platform | Custom | B2B teams that want an agent writing into Webflow/WordPress/Contentful and will take a sales call for the bill. |
| Wildcard (#18) | AI visibility platform | From $99/mo | Shopify and multi-channel retailers who want product and collection visibility inside AI shopping answers, plus the catalog and content work to fix it, measured through to orders. |
Key features
- Engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Overviews (4 engines, daily); Claude on Growth (5th)
- Findability Score 0-100 across 5 pillars: technical foundation, brand recognition, authority, content coverage, ranking share
- Drafts fixes (llms.txt, schema, Wikidata, counter-article, outreach) and ships them through Claude Code or Cursor as a reviewable diff
- Auto-push to WordPress, Ghost or Webflow; Reddit and X citation signals; GSC, API/MCP, Looker Studio, Ahrefs (BYOK)
Frequently asked questions
Does GetIntel include AI crawler logs like Promptwatch?
Not as a published product. GetIntel tracks whether AI engines name and cite your brand and drafts fixes. It does not publish a crawler-log view of which ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot hits your site or the crawl-to-citation path. That layer is what Promptwatch calls Agent Analytics.
Does GetIntel show AI-referred traffic and conversions?
Not on this listing. GetIntel reports a Findability Score and Reddit and X citation signals. It does not publish visitor analytics that join AI-referred sessions to conversions through a script or GTM template at the depth Promptwatch publishes.
Can GetIntel publish GEO articles to a CMS?
Pro and above can auto-push drafted fixes to WordPress, Ghost or Webflow. The listing does not document Content Agents that plan, write and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox at the depth Promptwatch publishes.
Best GetIntel alternatives
See allFull-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.
Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
- One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
- Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
Rex, an autonomous GEO employee that publishes into your CMS — public price is 'Custom,' and the $199 blog posts are gone.
Best for: B2B teams that want an agent writing into Webflow/WordPress/Contentful and will take a sales call for the bill.
- Clear product idea: an agent that publishes, not only a dashboard
- Docs list per-operation credit costs, so usage is at least inspectable after you buy
YC-backed AEO/GEO platform for ecommerce: SKU-level prompt tracking across AI shopping surfaces, then catalog fixes published to Shopify.
Best for: Shopify and multi-channel retailers who want product and collection visibility inside AI shopping answers, plus the catalog and content work to fix it, measured through to orders.
- Only tool in this catalog that tracks Walmart Sparky and Alexa+ Shopping alongside the chat engines
- Tracking and the visibility audit are free; you pay per action shipped
Agency-first AI visibility stack with live-UI prompt capture, a fix list, and technical agents that ship schema and crawl repairs.
Best for: Agencies running AI visibility for a book of clients who want white-label reporting, per-country tracking and a Technical Agent that applies schema and crawlability fixes.
- Eight engines captured from real interfaces, with per-country and per-language isolation
- An action layer and a live Technical Agent, not just a score
Articles that mention GetIntel
Best AI Search Link Tracking Tools That Fix Citation Gaps 2026
Best AI Search Tracking Tools for SEO Agents 2026
Best AI SEO Tools for Solo Founders 2026
Best AI SEO Tools with CMS Publishing 2026
Otterly.AI Alternatives That Act, Not Just Report (2026)
Useomia Alternatives for Teams That Want Agents, Not Dashboards