AIGeschikt review: pricing, features & alternatives

aigeschikt.nl/en and llms.txt (read 20 October 2026), excl. VAT. Kern, 299 EUR/mo: 1 domain, 3 finished pieces a month ready to publish plus optimisations where the measurement calls for them, 1,300 measurements a week across 5 engines, articles, page edits and schema, approval from your inbox, competitors in view. Groei, 499 EUR/mo: everything in Kern plus AIGeschikt in ChatGPT via MCP, 5 pieces a month, a new page in your house style every quarter, a quarterly technical AI check and report, and an answer within one working day. Enterprise is on request and aimed at teams with their own experts. Partner for agencies is white-label from 899 EUR/mo.

There is no setup fee or annual contract, and anything AIGeschikt placed on your site can be removed with one action. The free scan asks ten buying questions from your market, in Dutch or English, and shows who is named and whether you are.

AIGeschikt's method is repetition: the same 100 questions, frozen, asked several times a week per question, because one AI answer is chance and a month of answers is a pattern. Its blog has posts on putting an error margin next to each percentage and on the difference between being retrieved and being cited.

Its AI monitor puts Dutch buying questions from 30 markets to ChatGPT and Perplexity and records the sources. The headline figure, that 76.6% of sources in an AI answer are ordinary business websites, was measured from 17 August to 27 September 2026 on those two engines, and AIGeschikt itself calls it an upper bound. The site also runs comparison pages against Promptwatch, Profound, Peec AI and Scrunch; treat those as vendor material.

Every row below is a capability we already listed for AIGeschikt. It is the published feature set for this page, not a guess at an unpublished demo. Compare it with the Promptwatch checklist that follows.

On this listing, AIGeschikt is a GEO service for Dutch SMEs with no marketing team that want AI-answer content written and published for them, approving each piece from their inbox. What we sourced here: Frozen set of 100 Dutch buying questions per client, about 1,300 measurements a week across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews; Diagnosis per buying question of which sources carry the answer and what your site is missing; Articles, page edits and schema written from facts you confirm; 3 a month on Kern, 5 on Groei; One-click approval by email; nothing goes live without it, and placed content is removed on request; Publishing to WordPress, Ghost, Shopify, Webflow, Wix, Squarespace and custom APIs, including multilingual pages.

If you buy AIGeschikt for the job above, plan a second tool (or Promptwatch) for the layers this listing does not document. Still missing here: Visitor analytics: AI-referred sessions and conversions; Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox; Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level; Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo; Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks); ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar; Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans. Paid Promptwatch brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).

AIGeschikt's public pages (and this listing) describe a narrower job than Promptwatch. Most rivals answer whether you were mentioned. Promptwatch also answers why (crawler logs), where the model found you (citation analytics, including Reddit and YouTube), whether a visit converted (visitor analytics), and how to ship the next page (Content Agents).

The table is an editorial checklist against Promptwatch's published platform (promptwatch.com/llms.txt, 2026-08-23). It is not a hidden feature list for this vendor. 'Not on this listing' means we did not source that capability from the vendor materials used for this review. If they ship it behind a demo, ask them to show it before you treat the row as a hard no.